← Answers

Answers

Can automated scanners find all accessibility issues?

In short: No. Automated scanners reliably detect machine-testable failures — missing alt text, unlabelled inputs, a missing page language, empty links — but commonly cited industry estimates put their coverage at roughly 30–40% of WCAG issues. Whether alt text is meaningful, focus order is logical or a screen-reader flow is usable still needs a human. A clean scan is not proof of compliance.

Last updated:

What automation does well

What needs a human

How to use a scanner honestly

Use it as the first pass and as a regression monitor, claim only what you have verified, and plan manual audits of key templates and flows. The W3C also notes that tools can assist an evaluation but cannot determine accessibility on their own.

Official sources

See where your site stands

Our free automated scan checks your page against machine-testable WCAG 2.1 AA rules in about 20 seconds — no signup, no overlay.

Scan your site free →
FAQ
Why do scanners give different scores for the same page?
Each tool runs its own set of rules and weights them differently. Compare which WCAG criteria a tool actually checks rather than the score alone — our methodology page lists ours.
Can AI replace manual accessibility testing?
Not today. AI can help suggest code fixes for issues a scanner finds, but judging whether an experience is usable for disabled people still requires human testing.

General information, not legal advice. National transposition laws differ — consult a lawyer for a binding assessment of your business.

Related on NormHarbor: Methodology · Scan vs. audit · Free website scan

Does the European Accessibility Act apply to my small business? · When did the European Accessibility Act take effect? · Are accessibility overlay widgets EAA compliant?